Resilience - overcoming crises
The digitalization of strategic purchasing
Ever since vehicle manufacturers' production came to a standstill due to a lack of small parts from China, it should be clear to everyone how dependent companies are on functioning supply chains.
In light of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, procurement organizations around the world are busy stabilizing or radically restructuring their supply chains. Manufacturing companies in particular are currently seeing very clearly that this is almost impossible or extremely costly and time-consuming without end-to-end digitalization of their source-to-pay process. A lack of transparency means that buyers can neither gain an overview of their entire supplier network nor comprehensively assess risks. This is especially true if they work with a large number of different suppliers. This article provides an overview of the key elements of supplier management and shows how a digitized procurement process can help organizations build an agile and resilient supply chain.
Improve the quality and management of supplier data
Supplier data is at the heart of every procurement activity - from the selection of suitable partners and sourcing to the ordering and invoicing process. For buyers who are involved in the regular procurement of materials for production, an up-to-date database is of crucial importance, especially in times of crisis: if buyers have all the necessary information available digitally, they can find a suitable replacement much more quickly if a supplier fails. In addition, they can compare different sourcing scenarios in advance and secure production and storage capacities at an early stage.
However, practice shows that the necessary requirements for this have not yet been met in many organizations. Important details about suppliers, product catalogs and purchasing conditions are often still stored in individually maintained Excel spreadsheets, Access databases, emails, folders or even on sticky notes. In order to make a procurement decision or decide on a new supplier, the procurement team first has to analyze them manually. In addition, many employees had to work from home during this year of crisis. It has become a productivity-inhibiting problem that the required data is not immediately available to all buyers digitally "at the touch of a button". Instead, they have to make time-consuming and sometimes unacceptable trips to the office and coordinate with colleagues. These circumstances make it considerably more difficult to make strategic procurement decisions and ultimately also have an impact on the management and resilience of the supply chain. There is therefore an urgent need for action.
Tip: Organizations should start digitizing supplier data and product catalogs as soon as possible, bundling all information in a central location and making it available to their buyers. Companies that have already started restructuring should check whether and how they can expand or improve the measures.
Improve risk and performance management
The evaluation of suppliers is a very complex topic. Depending on the product, all suppliers have to meet very specific requirements. In addition to quality and price, this also includes the evaluation of production capacities and compliance with a wide range of regulations.
The purchasing department must check compliance and ensure that suppliers
- offer as little potential risk as possible that could impair business operations,
- maintain the required product quality
- (be able to) keep sufficient production capacity available
- deliver on time in the agreed batch sizes,
- have all the necessary certifications,
- fulfill regulatory requirements and
- comply with corporate social responsibility (CSR) guidelines.
In order to make well-founded procurement decisions, buyers need a wide range of different information. Organizations generate this information themselves, request it from suppliers or purchase it from third parties - but above all, they must systematically evaluate and interpret it. Central databases and the introduction of supporting processes are essential for this. The entire organization must be able to analyse data from various sources, compare it with defined key performance indicators (KPIs) and make the results available to its purchasing managers in a clear format. This is the only way to give them a complete picture of each supplier and therefore of their entire supply chain.
Tip: Organizations should expand their risk and performance management to support their procurement teams in the selection and management of supplier relationships - and actively involve partners in this process.
Rethink sourcing strategy and diversify suppliers
Constantly reducing costs is an ongoing task for companies. This is why many companies have individual parts or entire component groups manufactured by a few selected suppliers. But what use are favorable purchasing conditions if the required parts are delivered late or not at all because a strategically important supplier has to close its plant?
Simply commissioning local suppliers (local sourcing) can only solve this problem to a limited extent - and certainly not in the short term. After all, if only one case of coronavirus occurs at the moment, the manufacturer may have to temporarily shut down operations in this country too. In plain language, this means that companies should broaden their supplier base and secure production capacities for mission-critical products in good time. In the event of an emergency, there should be at least one other supplier for important supplier products who produces in another region.
Although this move away from traditional single sourcing is usually associated with a reduction in purchasing prices, companies can significantly reduce their default risks with this strategy. Multiple sourcing can also be worthwhile: Buyers agree certain minimum purchase quantities with several companies and at the same time secure options for further deliveries. In this way, they can reserve the production capacity required for emergencies and at the same time order the majority from the cheapest supplier. The possible combinations are varied and very individual - this task can no longer be carried out manually, especially for manufacturing companies with a large product portfolio.
Tip: When selecting partners, buyers should always adopt the same approach as an experienced investor who wants to ensure stable returns: it is better to forego short-term gains and spread the default risk more widely.
Rethinking partnerships
Especially in the manufacturing industry, relationships with suppliers are traditionally rather strained, but in times of crisis, the entire supply chain usually suffers. A cooperative approach helps to mitigate the effects for everyone involved. This can only work if the traditionally strained relationship between customer and supplier is improved. First and foremost, this requires a change in mindset: Customers and their suppliers should see their counterparts as partners and not purely as a sourcing source or sales market. They should also share the knowledge they have gained with each other. Suppliers will be able to plan customer requests more efficiently and communicate information about potential delivery problems to their customers earlier. All stakeholders are then aware of potential problems at an early stage and can act accordingly. In addition, buyers can help their partners to solve temporary cash flow problems - for example by paying invoices early. This is made possible with the help of financing solutions such as dynamic discounting or supply chain financing, which improve the liquidity of suppliers and at the same time benefit the client as it achieves more favorable purchase prices.
Tip: In order to keep supply chains stable in times of crisis, companies need to work more closely and in partnership with their partners. Managers should therefore not only pay attention to technology, but also initiate a cultural change within their organization.
Ensuring transparency along the entire supply chain
In the manufacturing industry, buyers know their strategically important tier 1 suppliers very well. What they lack, however, is information about their partners' supply chains. However, it is precisely this transparency that is of crucial importance when choosing a sourcing strategy, as purchasing not only has to order cheaply, but also ensure a continuous supply. This applies in particular to direct materials: if a supplier is unexpectedly unavailable, there is a risk that mission-critical products such as semi-finished products or standard parts will either be delivered late or not at all. The absence of a simple standard screw alone can quickly lead to an expensive production standstill.
Too little attention is often paid to tier 2 and tier 3 suppliers. Especially in the current pandemic, this is now falling on companies' shoulders: the loss of several partners who produce in the same region or have suppliers there quickly leads to supply bottlenecks and can put even large manufacturers in economic difficulties within a few months. However, if they recognize dependencies early on, they can adapt their sourcing strategy or initiate appropriate emergency measures together with their suppliers.
Tip: Organizations need to ensure that purchasing can make more informed, faster and more flexible procurement decisions. For example, the employees responsible should know exactly which partners they and their suppliers are working with. They also need all the information they need to make procurement decisions in a format that is easy to access - regardless of their current location or new home office.
No well-founded purchasing decisions without digitalization
Many companies are currently struggling with the stability, reliability and resilience of their supply chains. They are experiencing delivery failures and costly production stops. The pressure on buyers is enormous. However, in order to make informed procurement decisions, employees responsible for procurement need as complete an overview as possible of all spend and suppliers - and must also be able to quickly analyze and assess risks. They also need to have the right skills, tools and processes in place to quickly find, validate and integrate suitable suppliers into their supply chains. The digitalization of all source-to-pay processes plays a key role in overcoming the current crisis situation. By obtaining, aggregating and automatically evaluating supplier, performance and risk data, buyers gain a comprehensive overview of their supply chain and receive meaningful support in their procurement decisions - and can react much faster. Many companies still have a lot of catching up to do in this area.
Source-to-pay software can help organizations manage spend and suppliers. There are many providers of such solutions. Providers that make it onto the shortlist should be thoroughly evaluated. In particular, decision-makers should ensure that their purchasers receive real transparency across their entire supply chain and that the evaluation of important key performance indicators is automated and included in the overall view.
But software is not everything, and restructuring supply chains can only work as an overall concept. Companies should define procurement targets that are not only based on favorable purchase prices, but also focus on strategic cooperation with suppliers. At the same time, it is advisable to put established concepts such as single sourcing and just-in-time production to the test.
Companies should see the coronavirus crisis as an opportunity and finally make the restructuring of their supply chains a higher priority. They should bring suppliers on board as real partners - and make budgets available for initial pilot projects as soon as possible.
Alex Saric, Smart Procurement expert at Ivalua










